The Alabama coaching staff exploited the one thing LSU’s money can’t buy: Patience
The connection between football and war is a long one.
The parallels between them have been drawn frequently, dating all the way back to the inception of the sport. The Alabama victory over LSU made those same connections in my own brain. Those connections were not the usual names and places of American conflicts like Chickamauga, Jackson, Arracort, or Patton. My military history-soaked grey matter instead dug back further to a brilliant commander whose accomplishments were sadly neglected by the Alabama Public School system: Flavius Belisarius.
A century after the collapse of the Western Roman Empire, and in the shadow of its conquest by my scalp-taking, skull-cup-a-swilling Germanic ancestors, Belisarius, a native of semi-barbarian Thrace (modern day Bulgaria), was given the title Magister Militum, and sent forth to subdue the barbarian hordes and take the fight to the Sassanid Persians along the Empire’s Eastern border. Always short of troops, supplies, and support he went on a three-decade tour of the Mediterranean Basin doling out ass kickings to Goths, Persians, and everyone in between.
His approach to war relied on exploiting the mental weaknesses of his opponent as much as battlefield clashes. This was long into the twilight of the Legions, and his own troops were barely equal in quality (and usually inferior in quality) to the Germanic and Persian opponents he was tasked to defeat. In most every case a frontal clash was the option of last resort. Belisarius instead used the enemy commanders’ own aggression to maneuver the into a disadvantage before striking. It was that approach that Saturday’s ass kicking of LSU, twigged in the dusty recesses of my frontal cortex.
Alabama faced a similar challenge on Saturday. The transfer portal, injuries, and youth left Alabama at a disadvantage against LSUs Sassanid-like level of roster spending. The on-field matchups overwhelming favored LSU.
As a two-score underdog, Alabama’s own Magister Militum, Kalen Deboer, along with bucellarii Wommack and Grubb, elected to strike at LSU’s greatest weakness: their brains.
This version of LSU is built on the big play.
Lane made his name audibling in to create huge chunk plays on-field and flinging clipboards into the air. Blake Baker’s aggressive defenses do much the same with less damage to the office supplies. Naturally, 2026 LSU mirrors those coaches with a scrambling, bomb-tossing QB, and a downhill, QB sack-leading defense.
Patience is a four-letter word on both sides of the ball in Baton Rouge. The Alabama staff exploited that lack of patience masterfully. The defense played off-coverage, denying Leavitt his highlight reel tosses. Spying linebackers did mostly the same for the big scrambles. Those underneath throws were met with teeth rattling tackles from ‘Bama defenders. The Alien Trey’dez Green got his catches, to be sure. But they were seven-yard gains, not a xenomorph running free in the second level.
Offensively, Grubb mixed runs, screens, and quick passes to deny the LSU defense its chance at sacks and TFLs. Kiffin and Baker’s rising frustration levels were written plain across their faces as the game wore on. Meanwhile, Leavitt’s frustration boiled over in a more tangible way. In the Tigers’ critical end-of-half drive, already trailing 10-3, he threw one of the stupidest picks you will ever see: a meatball directly into a seven-man zone, with three red jerseys around the receiver. Luke Metz made the play, but there were two other ‘Bama defenders standing behind him to make the easy interception as well.
It was only when the LSU offense closed into the red zone that Alabama unleashed it’s own counterstroke. Instead of drop-8 coverage, Wommack unleashed full boogie, cover-0 right
into the face of a confused Leavitt.
Grubb hit Baker’s’ defense (and ego) with his own flanking attack, scoring two laughably easy touchdowns on a WR end around, and a TE delay.
Lane himself short-circuited. Denied the dopamine hit of huge shock plays, and feeling
the squeeze of a familiar crimson trunk around his neck, he started trying for riskier and riskier 4th down conversions — using some laughably predictable play calls. Wommack had the counterpunches waiting, and Alabama stopped every single one cold, setting up the Tide offense to rout the Tigers.
The LSU defense, long denied its chance to hammer the slippery Russell, ratcheted up the
aggression. When shown a TE screen which had gashed them on the opening drive, they compulsively attacked and left Cederian Morgan with an easy over-the-shoulder touchdown reception to put the spatha through the ribs of LSU.
Although winning football games can be an exercise in exploiting matchups between superior athletes, by creative play design, or by simply bringing the hardest skull to the headbutting contest, there is also a deeper approach to victory that exploits the mental weaknesses of the opponent. In this age of parity, the indirect approach of a Thracian general from 1500 years ago, an approach that attacks the one thing teams can’t buy, may be the way to tilt the football field in the Crimson Tide’s favor.
Patience.



The only thing I will disagree with here is him calling the Thrax semi barbarians. Thracians were absolutely, 100% barbarians. LOL.
Maybe to you bougie polites types in the City.
Thracians spoke Greek of a sort, drank wine, and allegedly a couple of them could read. That elevates them above your garden variety Hun or Sarmatian
Lest I remind you, the Mongolians preserved the wisdom of the east and the west, and disseminated education and trade across two continents. Barbarians come in in many different shades because I don’t think anyone would accuse the hordes of being urbane either.
But they were barbarians, kinda just like the Thracians were barbarians.
For the true, lice in their beards, stinking of fat and campfire, barbarians, you really need to get to the Gauls and the Germans: Illiterate savages and destroyers. The only ones who ever broke from that mold had been Romanicized. Hell, even the Celts were more developed.
PS. forgive that whole “Sack of Baghdad thing.”
The Mongol Empire had a strong internal civilizing influence from the Chinese and various Mameluke kingdoms they conquered.
sure…a century later, and after the true knock-on influence of Kublai sinocizing administration.
The Sack of Baghdad may be the greatest FAFO moment in history
I wonder how good their wine was
The guy to ask would be Max Miller
KDB and Co. outcoached LMFK. It was a masterclass to say the least. I just hope we can keep this momentum going for the remainder of the schedule. RT!
I chose “coaching” because I think the better execution was itself the result of better coaching.
I don’t think better execution is responsible for the game planning in this case. There was better execution for sure, but the game plan on both sides was also predicated on being patient and letting LSU mistakes come to them.
Which eventually they did
I agree; what I meant was that the two options in the poll were not distinct because the better execution resulted from the better coaching. It’s one thing to plan to do what we did; it’s another thing to coach the team to be able to execute that plan.
This is especially true on defense; a less well-prepared team might have panicked when “giving up” so many yards between the 20s. These coaches had our guys believing in the plan and that the results would come, even when it seemed like bad things were happening. I know I was having some BP spikes when LSU was seemingly gaining yards at will. It took me some time to realize that it wasn’t an unsustainable coincidence that they were gaining yards but no points, and it was happening because we wanted it to happen.
I can only imagine what it would be like to be one of the guys on defense in the moment, adrenaline pumping, knowing that I have to just be patient and do my job within the plan and it’ll all be OK, and trust that the other 10 guys will do the same.
This defense isn’t perfect, but right now I wouldn’t trade them or our DC for anybody else’s.My favorite thing about the game we played on Saturday is that, to me, it was a complete team football game. Obviously this team (not roster, but team) is bought in already, but Saturday should’ve sealed the deal.
well, I suspect we lose at least one (and perhaps both) coordinator this year. Kane is going to be THE hot assistant name, along with Schuman
One of those would be addition by subtraction.
Great write-up! Just another example of KdB and Staff showing their big game coaching prowess (and Lane showing his lack of it).
Last week, I took some solace in the fact that the staff seemed to dialed in, and they were treating this as just a regular game, whereas LSU had made a huge giant production of it for two weeks.
There’s something to be said for consistency
A century after
thecollapse ofthe Western Roman Empire turned into the Catholic Church….This would have been over 2 centuries since Constantine converted.
This was 100% better coaching. Because our tackling was the drizzling $#!&$.
Tackling has been an issue since a Wommack got here. Our fundamentals suck.
Please. How many missed tackles? … and how many dropped passes?
Dude — good piece. I love it. I’m an old jarhead and love military history.
So you joined EE? Excellent. I’m Rodney Daytona on RBR. Please keep up the good work. Youse guys are killing it! Put a Paypal contribution button on your site, perhaps? I’d subscribe…and HEAL up EE!
Roll Tide
Welcome! Im really glad you enjoyed it. This is the first non-technical writing Ive ever done (aside from 25 years of comments on various forums and blogs).
Erik gives me a good bit of leeway so Im just trying to share the things that tickle my brain that I yall might enjoy.
There is a really great crew of people over here. Erik, Ike, and TBT are all great writers and I am super proud just to be invited to share this corner of the matrix with them
Are y’all in this for money, fun, creative outlet or YES?
Fun and creative outlet.
eternal fame
Don’t let them lie to you, they’re all in it for the drugs and the chicks.
I am genuinely impressed with your citing of the great Belisarius. That man brought back “In hoc signo vinces” with. A. VENGEANCE.