Not a lot of movement this week despite the Game of the Century
Welcome to Week 3 of the 2026 Blogpoll. There were some big (and biggish) games this weekend, and we were able to start sorting out who’s real, who’s on the cusp of fraud status, as well as the general identity and tenor of the season. And it’s coming up “SEC” on most rolls of the die.
The Blog Poll is not a power poll. It is not biased by preseason polls (to the extent that I can manage). The criteria are nebulous, far-ranging, and capricious — strength of schedule, bad and good coaching, injuries, exigent circumstances, home/away results, defense or lack thereof, offense or lack thereof, line play, power poll-ishness, can you cover a spread. (Vegas is pretty smart about how good a team is), head-to-head where possible or prudent, and my own lying eyeballs. Who you beat has to matter the most at the end of the day, and who you lose to is relevant to the extent a tiebreaker is required among several candidates. Earlier polls lacking data points are obviously more fluid than later ones.
On to Week three. Notes to follow.

The Top 10 sees very little movement, aside from A&M and LSU dropping out. In the case of the Tigers, their fall was not quite so precipitous as the Aggies. LSU is still a dangerous team with a lot of weapons; they simply got beaten by a better team on Saturday night. In the case of Texas A&M, they took a major plunge in the rankings: Not only has Marcel Reed not improved, but the secondary was vulnerable all day, and the Wildcats repeatedly punished them up the middle on the ground. For a team that wants to win along the lines, the Ags were dominated there.
Kentucky, Florida, and Mississippi State all make their debut in the Blogpoll this week, all three on the heels of important conference road games, and where all three shined. That UA/MSU game in Starkville is looking a mighty bit dangerous now beyond merely representing “trap game” talking points. That’s especially true if the Alabama secondary we saw on Saturday makes an appearance against the Bulldogs — they’ll lose. But, the cream of the crop (at least for now), are the Georgia Bulldogs and Texas Longhorns. Though, this weekend we do get one elimination game when A&M travels to Baton Rouge, and another game to sort out pecking order, as the Ole Miss Rebels hit the road for the Swamp in a battle of unbeatens.
I think there are some decent, even good, teams in the Big 12: Houston, Utah, BYU, Cincy among them. But we cannot justify raising Texas Tech any higher than this after being gifted a win by the stripes at home, and with a schedule that saw them play their one and only ranked opponent last Thursday. Gross. Steve Sarkisian needs to get on their ass again. That’s simply pitiful.
That said, it’s not much different than the Big 10, where Indiana doesn’t play a ranked team for another month (and that’s counting on USC and Michigan being ranked), and which has a schedule where its opponents have one combined win. Like the Red Raiders, this team just doesn’t look like itself from last year. Unlike the Red Raiders, they’re actually playing defense. The whole conference if full of enigmas though. Do we think undefeated Northwestern, Nebraska, or Michigan are good? How is it possible for Penn State to change coaches and still look like Penn State? Is UCLA actually as good as they’ve looked? While we’re learning much about the rest of the country, owing to shameful scheduling we still know almost nothing about this league, other than Ohio State is really talented and will be in the playoffs.
The ACC is a bit easier to sort out (for a change). It’s Miami, then everyone else. Though perhaps the gap isn’t quite so large as we once imagined. The Hurricanes have far more talent than almost anyone in the country, so they’ll always win that battle. But they didn’t look so crisp on the road against Wake, the first Power 4 team they’ve faced. Now, imagine a game against an actually talented team — someone like Louisville in the ACCCG. There’s a reason Cristobal hitting the road terrifies ‘Canes fans. Miami also has to stare down Notre Dame, in the marquee matchup for both. Duke is looking dangerous down there, and it doesn’t appear as though Virginia has gone anywhere either.
And pulling up the G5 train are the last men standing (for now), the James Madison Dukes, who keep losing coaches, keep losing players, and keep winning impressively — this week’s effort? Crossing the country to San Diego, shutting down the Aztecs, and winning by three scores. Just a thoroughly impressive program.
That’s it for now. We’ll be back next week after a very eventful week in the SEC especially.
Who’s too low? Too high? Georgia, Texas or someone else entirely at No. 1?



I’d say this about a lot of teams we play. If Alabama can’t stop the pass, then why even attempt to run on them. That being said, not every team is going to have a gunslinger. However, whether or not said QB gets possessed by the ghost of Stephen Garcia is a whole different story.
http://<div class=”tenor-gif-embed” data-postid=”1876611732727534847″ data-share-method=”host” data-aspect-ratio=”1″ data-width=”100%”><a href=”https://tenor.com/view/exorcism-father-mulvehill-evil-z-is-for-zombies-get-out-evil-spirit-gif-1876611732727534847″>Exorcism Father Mulvehill GIF</a>from <a href=”https://tenor.com/search/exorcism-gifs”>Exorcism GIFs</a></div> <script type=”text/javascript” async src=”https://tenor.com/embed.js”></script>
Lemme see what’s going on there. Because that code looks right.
Hey Troll —
You have two tabs in your comment field, Visual and Code. The Visual editor is the pretty one, but if you’re going to paste in raw HTML code, swap over to the other one.
It just did it to me too, and I’m using the right input, and I obviously know how to embed gifs
Something is going in the backend, but I have no idea what it is.
this wasn’t a user error this time
@I knew I wasn’t a retard@
Hey Ike,
From my understanding just posting the raw code should be working. It shouldn’t matter which view I am in. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
If we’re going on quality of wins, then I think Ole Miss is a top-5 team. UGA/Miami/ND/Indiana haven’t played anybody, much less beat multiple ranked teams. tOSU hasn’t either other than losing to Texas. Texas and Alabama have good wins, but I can see OM ahead of us right now based on LSU+LVille > UK+FSU. I think I’d swap OM and ND. ND is talented and should destroy pretty much everybody they play except maybe Miami, but they don’t deserve to be ranked so high based on what they’ve done so far IMO.
(plus, you know, f*** ’em).
I agree. But it’s not just quality of wins either though — if it were, I could make a case for MSU being a Top 10 team after B2B weeks where they were on the road and beat Minnesota and South Carolina decisively
I use a lot of advanced stats and efficiency data too
I suspect where you think Ole Miss belongs depends on how much you think of LSU. I think they’re both Top 10ish, with some weaknesses.
That makes sense. I think that I’m differentiating more between a “rating” and a “ranking” than you are. I would rate several teams ahead of Ole Miss that I would put behind them in a ranking based on what they’ve done so far this season against their respective schedules. Your list is (to my eyes) a combination of both.
Rating vs ranking is confusing to this oldtimer.
How ’bout this. I think Georgia would beat Texas on a neutral field, so I put them at number 1.
Everything else looks about right.
Ranking is (or I think it should be) based on how good you’ve been. It’s an indicator of past performance. And rating is how you’re likely to perform in the future.
Like right now, I bet most folks would have Georgia power rated higher than Alabama, but I’d rank us higher based on who we’ve beaten. We’ve beaten the SP+ #90, #49 (an SEC team on the road who then went to Kyle Field and won), and #53; UGA has beaten an FCS team, winless SP+ #122, and #105. Our worst win is better than their best win.
The problem with rankings is usually that voters allow historical performance, preseason hype, and future projections to skew their opinions. Mississippi State and Florida should both probably be ranked higher than Oregon (in the AP), for example, but Oregon was good last year and was highly-ranked coming into the season, so despite struggling against Boise and then losing to Oklahoma State (who went 1-11 last year and was already 0-1 on the year), they’re still #20 because voters don’t want to drop them out and because some of them think Oregon will be good later in the year. Kentucky should be ranked too, and probably ahead of TAM whose best win is Arizona St., but “it’s Kentucky” is working against them, despite having #8 on the ropes for over a half and beating a then-top-10 TAM in their own building by two scores.